I was trying to understand why the BS mix station plays the Vapors nearly every day. Had I been wrong about ‘Turning Japanese? Had it been this smash hit, holding the number 1 spot for 12 weeks, and I somehow missed it? Could I have been so busy trying to finally get laid that I missed Vapor Mania? They certainly play ‘Turning Japanese’ more than Toto’s ‘Rosanna’ which was a big hit for several weeks as I recall. (this isn’t to say I really want to hear ‘Rosanna’ either, just trying to understand the criteria) What made the Vapors more worthy of airplay in 2007 than say Felony or Fruer? They were no less significant in my memory.
Time to get some answers. As it turns out The Vapors had barely troubled the top 40, Turning Japanese peaked at 36. Rosanna had only made it to number 2 in the top 40, but also did quite well in Adult Contemporary (peak # 17) and mainstream rock (peak # 8)
Ignoring for a moment the fallacy of the specialized charts, Rosanna was a much bigger hit than turning Japanese any way you slice it. So is this just another example of having our own nostalgia marketed to us in a way that we would choose to remember as opposed to what truly was? I guess this isn’t a new thing, no one ever says that during the 60’s they actually preferred Freddie and dreamers to the Beatles and Stones. What isn’t clear to me is how or why anyone would prefer Turning Japanese to whatever the real hits were?
Felony’s the Fanatic peaked at 42, and Fruer’s Doot doot didn’t bother the top 40 at all. But 10-9-8 by Face to face reached #38, and I bet you’ll never hear it on a mix station at all. I’d rather hear ‘She looks a lot like you’ by the Cars sound-alike the Clocks, if we’re going celebrate songs no one cared about.
I couldn’t help feeling a bit sorry for the lowly Vapors, they predated the phony specialized charts, so there they were stuck at 36 barely troubling the mighty top 40 at all. Had there existed a chart for fair-to-spare new wave acts, they would surely have gone top 10. Let’s face it, all these ‘modern rock’ or “mainstream rock’ charts are simply designed to pad the stats of average acts, and get more of them into the charts… any charts. If they made a top 40 of blogs I wouldn’t get a sniff, but what if it were a top 40 of blogs called ‘pills thrills and bellyaches? Suddenly I’m #27 with a bullet.
Billboard stats provided by allmusic.com (you should visit it once in a while, and would it kill you to write?)